Sometimes AI works quickly and that's awesome. I'm even giving a paper on uses of AI at the SRAI conference in Hawaii and another the AISES conference in Portland, Oregon, both in October. It's called "Uses of Generative AI in research administration: The good, the bad and the ugly." I'm talking about the good, so I am not an AI hater.
However, when AI doesn't give the correct answer on the first or second shot, I have found it to invariably be faster to forget AI and solve the issue without it. As far as the claim that generative AI has "Ph.D. level intelligence". If you measure that by whether a person has an actual Ph.D. , I have Ph.D. level intelligence and the score today is: Me: 1 , AI: 0